Dr. Snell's Fall 1997 Course Evaluations.  E-mail: WESNELL@semovm.semo.edu
___________________Evaluations_Items___________________ PY101.03 PY101.04 PY484 PY531
(1 = Strongly Disagree)   (2 = Agree)   (3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree)   (4 = Agree)   (5 = Strongly Agree)
1. The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 4.84 4.75 4.56 4.77
2. The instructor generally encouraged class participation. 4.45 4.21 4.44 4.64
3. The instructor emphasized major points and made their relationship and significance clear. 4.65 4.63 4.22 3.91
4. The instructor seemed to be interested in teaching. 4.84 4.79 4.89 4.41
5. The instructor's use of examples helped to get points across in class. 4.71 4.63 4.44 4.24
6. The instructor encouraged students to express their own viewpoints. 4.36 4.25 4.33 4.23
7. Students had the opportunity to ask questions. 4.90 4.79 4.67 4.77
8. The course was well organized. 4.84 4.67 4.33 4.18
9. The instructor's presentations were well prepared. 4.77 4.63 4.44 3.73
10. The instructor appeared to be thoroughly competent in his/her area. 4.74 4.83 5.00 4.82
11. The instructor gave effective help when it was sought. 4.55 4.29 4.56 3.91
12. The tests adequately covered the course material. 4.61 4.52 NA NA
13. The instructor returned tests and assignments within a reasonable period of time. 4.77 4.71 4.89 4.41
14. The instructor made her/his grading procedures clear. 4.71 4.58 3.89 4.55
15. The instructor's grading standards were fair and reasonable. 4.55 4.57 3.56 3.77
16. I gained considerable knowledge from this course. 4.55 4.67 4.33 3.59
17. The textbook used in this course was satisfactory. 4.42 4.30 3.67 4.00
(1 = Strongly Disagree) (2 = Agree) (3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree) (4 = Agree) (5 = Strongly Agree)
You are visitor number: Hit Counter
This site was last updated on June 17, 2007.
Copyright @ 1998       William E. Snell, Jr. All rights reserved.
AS REQUIRED BY UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES, The instructor was not present when the students completed these instructor evaluations, a student took the evaluations to the Chair of the department, and the evaluation summaries were given to the instructor after the semester was completed.
Back