|
Dr. Snell's Fall 2001 Course Evaluations.
|
| *
Department of Psychology Course Evaluations * |
| (1 = Strongly
Disagree) (2 = Agree) (3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree)
(4 = Agree) (5 = Strongly Agree) |
| __________PSYCHOLOGY
Evaluations_Items___________________ |
PY101.02 |
PY101.03 |
PY101.09 |
PY101.10 |
| 1. The instructor was
enthusiastic about the subject matter. |
4.96 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
| 2. The instructor generally encouraged
class participation. |
4.15 |
4.35 |
4.29 |
4.76 |
| 3. The instructor emphasized major
points and made their relationship and significance clear. |
4.62 |
4.70 |
4.46 |
4.81 |
| 4. The instructor seemed to be
interested in teaching. |
4.96 |
4.96 |
4.92 |
5.00 |
| 5. The instructor's use of examples
helped to get points across in class. |
4.73 |
4.87 |
4.38 |
4.81 |
| 6. The instructor encouraged students to
express their own viewpoints. |
3.65 |
4.09 |
4.00 |
4.52 |
| 7. Students had the opportunity to ask
questions. |
4.89 |
4.91 |
4.88 |
4.81 |
| 8. The course was well organized. |
4.85 |
4.91 |
4.42 |
4.95 |
| 9. The instructor's presentations were
well prepared. |
4.89 |
4.91 |
4.58 |
4.95 |
| 10. The instructor appeared to be
thoroughly competent in his/her area. |
4.96 |
4.91 |
4.92 |
4.95 |
| 11. The instructor gave effective help
when it was sought. |
4.46 |
4.48 |
4.58 |
4.81 |
| 12. The tests adequately covered the
course material. |
4.58 |
4.87 |
4.25 |
4.91 |
| 13. The instructor returned tests and
assignments within a reasonable period of time. |
4.62 |
4.65 |
4.50 |
4.81 |
| 14. The instructor made her/his grading
procedures clear. |
4.77 |
4.70 |
4.71 |
4.91 |
| 15. The instructor's grading standards
were fair and reasonable. |
4.77 |
4.78 |
4.83 |
5.00 |
| 16. I gained considerable knowledge from
this course. |
4.69 |
4.65 |
4.38 |
4.86 |
| 17. The textbook used in this course was
satisfactory. |
4.28 |
4.36 |
4.25 |
4.67 |
| * IDEA Course
Evaluations (Reported as national T-scores) * |
| (
< 37 = LOW) (37-44 = LOW AVERAGE) (45-55 =
AVERAGE) (56-63 = HIGH AVERAGE) ( > 63 = HIGH ) |
| _________________IDEA
Evaluations_Items___________________ |
PY101.02 |
PY101.03 |
PY101.09 |
PY101.10 |
| 1. Progress on Relevant
(Essential and Important) Objectives |
xx |
xx |
xx |
xx |
| 2. Improved Student Attitude |
xx |
xx |
xx |
xx |
| 3. Overall Excellence of
Teacher |
xx |
xx |
xx |
xx |
| 4. Overall Excellence of
Course |
xx |
xx |
xx |
xx |
| AS REQUIRED BY UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES,
(1) the instructor was not present when the
students completed these instructor evaluations, (2) a student took the
evaluations to the Chair of the department, and (3) the evaluation
summaries were given to the instructor after the semester was
completed. |
|
You are visitor number: 
This site was last updated on June 17, 2007.
Copyright @ 2001 William E. Snell, Jr. All rights
reserved.
E-mail: WESNELL@semovm.semo.edu
|