Dr. Snell's Spring 2005 Course Evaluations. 
* Department of Psychology Course Evaluations *
(1 = Strongly Disagree)   (2 = Agree)   (3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree)   (4 = Agree)   (5 = Strongly Agree)
__________Course Evaluations_Items_______________ PY101.09 PY101.74
online
PY484.02 PY531.73
online
1. The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 4.87 na 4.88 na
2. The instructor generally encouraged class participation. 4.04 na 4.75 na
3. The instructor emphasized major points and made their relationship and significance clear. 4.44 na 4.25 na
4. The instructor seemed to be interested in teaching. 4.78 na 4.88 na
5. The instructor's use of examples helped to get points across in class. 4.70 na 4.63 na
6. The instructor encouraged students to express their own viewpoints. 4.13 na 4.50 na
7. Students had the opportunity to ask questions. 4.74 na 4.88 na
8. The course was well organized. 4.87 na 4.50 na
9. The instructor's presentations were well prepared. 4.87 na 4.63 na
10. The instructor appeared to be thoroughly competent in his/her area. 4.83 na 4.88 na
11. The instructor gave effective help when it was sought. 4.52 na 4.88 na
12. The tests adequately covered the course material. 3.39 na 4.63 na
13. The instructor returned tests and assignments within a reasonable period of time. 4.70 na 4.63 na
14. The instructor made her/his grading procedures clear. 4.65 na 4.42 na
15. The instructor's grading standards were fair and reasonable. 4.44 na 4.38 na
16. I gained considerable knowledge from this course. 4.35 na 4.75 na
17. The textbook used in this course was satisfactory. 3.91 na 3.87 na
* IDEA Course Evaluations (Reported as national unadjusted T-scores) *
( < 37 = LOW)  (37-44 = LOW AVERAGE)  (45-55 = AVERAGE)  (56-63 = HIGH AVERAGE) ( > 63 = HIGH )
_________________IDEA Evaluations_Items___________________ PY101.09 PY101.74
online
PY484.02 PY531.73
online
1. Progress on Relevant (Essential and Important) Objectives na na na na
2. Improved Student Attitude na na na na
3. Overall Excellence of Teacher na na na na
4. Overall Excellence of Course na na na na
AS REQUIRED BY UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES, (1) the instructor was not present when the students completed these instructor evaluations, (2) a student took the evaluations to the Chair of the department, and (3) the evaluation summaries were given to the instructor after the semester was completed.  
You are visitor number: Hit Counter
This site was last updated on June 17, 2007.
Copyright @ 2001-2005  William E. Snell, Jr. All rights reserved.
E-mail: WESNELL@semo.edu