|
Dr. Snell's
Summer 2003 On-line Course Evaluation. E-mail: WESNELL@semo.edu
|
| ___________________Evaluations_Items___________________ |
PY101.74 |
|
(1 = Strongly Disagree) (2 = Agree) (3 = Neither
Agree nor Disagree) (4 = Agree) (5 = Strongly Agree) |
| 1. The
instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. |
na |
| 2. The instructor
generally encouraged class participation. |
na |
| 3. The instructor
emphasized major points and made their relationship and significance
clear. |
na |
| 4. The instructor
seemed to be interested in teaching. |
na |
| 5. The instructor's
use of examples helped to get points across in class. |
na |
| 6. The instructor
encouraged students to express their own viewpoints. |
na |
| 7. Students had the
opportunity to ask questions. |
na |
| 8. The course was well
organized. |
na |
| 9. The instructor's
presentations were well prepared. |
na |
| 10. The instructor
appeared to be thoroughly competent in his/her area. |
na |
| 11. The instructor
gave effective help when it was sought. |
na |
| 12. The tests
adequately covered the course material. |
na |
| 13. The instructor
returned tests and assignments within a reasonable period of time. |
na |
| 14. The instructor
made her/his grading procedures clear. |
na |
| 15. The instructor's
grading standards were fair and reasonable. |
na |
| 16. I gained
considerable knowledge from this course. |
na |
| 17. The textbook used
in this course was satisfactory. |
na |
| * IDEA Course
Evaluations (Reported as national T-scores) * |
| (
< 37 = LOW) (37-44 = LOW AVERAGE) (45-55 =
AVERAGE) (56-63 = HIGH AVERAGE) ( > 63 = HIGH ) |
| _________________IDEA
Evaluations_Items___________________ |
PY101.74 |
| 1. Progress on Relevant
(Essential and Important) Objectives |
61* |
| 2. Improved Student Attitude |
62* |
| 3. Overall Excellence of
Teacher |
53* |
| 4. Overall Excellence of
Course |
61* |
| AS REQUIRED BY UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES,
(1) the instructor was not present when the
students completed these instructor evaluations, (2) a student took the
evaluations to the Chair of the department, and (3) the evaluation
summaries were given to the instructor after the semester was
completed. |
|
You are visitor number:
This site was last updated on
June 17, 2007.
Copyright @ 2003 William E. Snell, Jr. All rights
reserved. |