Dr. Snell's Summer 2006 Course Evaluations. 
* Department of Psychology Course Evaluations *
(1 = Strongly Disagree)   (2 = Agree)   (3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree)   (4 = Agree)   (5 = Strongly Agree)
Departmental Course Evaluations Items: PY101.50
online
PY101.74
online
1. The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. na na
2. The instructor generally encouraged class participation. na na
3. The instructor emphasized major points and made their relationship and significance clear. na na
4. The instructor seemed to be interested in teaching. na na
5. The instructor's use of examples helped to get points across in class. na na
6. The instructor encouraged students to express their own viewpoints. na na
7. Students had the opportunity to ask questions. na na
8. The course was well organized. na na
9. The instructor's presentations were well prepared. na na
10. The instructor appeared to be thoroughly competent in his/her area. na na
11. The instructor gave effective help when it was sought. na na
12. The tests adequately covered the course material. na na
13. The instructor returned tests and assignments within a reasonable period of time. na na
14. The instructor made her/his grading procedures clear. na na
15. The instructor's grading standards were fair and reasonable. na na
16. I gained considerable knowledge from this course. na na
17. The textbook used in this course was satisfactory. na na
* IDEA Course Evaluations *
(1 = no apparent progress)   (2 = slight progress)   (3 = moderate progress)   (4 = substantial progress)   (5 = exceptional progress)
IDEA Evaluations Items PY101.50
online
PY101.74
online

A. Progress on Relevant (Essential and Important) Objectives

4.1 3.9
B. Overall Excellence of Teacher 4.3 4.2
C. Overall Excellence of Course 4.4 4.1
21. Gained factual knowledge 4.3 4.1
22. Learned fundamental principles, generalizations, or theories 4.1 4.1
23. Learned to apply course material 4.4 3.9
24. Developed psychological  skills, competencies & points of view 4.0 3.8
25. Acquired skills in working with other team members 3.9 3.4
26. Developed creative capacities (e.g., writing, etc.) 4.0 3.2
27. Gained broader understanding/appreciation of intellectual activity 4.3 3.4
28. Developed skill in expressing myself orally or in writing 4.0 3.6
29. Learned how to find & use resources 4.0 3.6
30. Developed clearer understanding of/commitment to personal values 4.0 3.5
31. Learned to analyze and critically evaluate ideas 4.3 3.6
32. Acquired interest in learning more 4.0 3.7

AS REQUIRED BY UNIVERSITY GUIDELINES, (1) the instructor was not present when the students completed these instructor evaluations, (2) a student took the evaluations to the Chair of the department, and (3) the evaluation summaries were given to the instructor after the semester was completed.

You are visitor number: Hit Counter
This site was last updated on June 17, 2007.
Copyright @ 2001-2007  William E. Snell, Jr. All rights reserved.
E-mail: WESNELL@semo.edu